Ten champions reshape the 2027 Olympia race
Ahmed Juraybi won Men’s Open, Anastasia Korableva took the closest decision, and the official tables settled all ten professional divisions in Bucharest.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Strength, endurance, functional fitness and human performance—reported fast, checked against the source and stripped of bro-science.
Enter the newsroom ↘Competition, participation, technology and industry intelligence—written as original ShreddedAF briefings with a transparent source trail.
Ahmed Juraybi won Men’s Open, Anastasia Korableva took the closest decision, and the official tables settled all ten professional divisions in Bucharest.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Iraq's +110 kg champion held off Alireza Yousefi, whose 263 kg clean and jerk set a world record on the final day in Ningbo.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Ethiopia swept the overall titles; the official elite tables and the limits of the live mass results are separated.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Revenue rose 1.5% and GAAP net income reached $96.2m, but paid connected-fitness subscriptions fell 9%.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Malaysia’s Terrence Teo Kok Hua won the six-athlete Classic Physique field at Moe’s Muscles Pro. New Zealand’s Harrison Booth placed second.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Levon Poghosyan topped a 14-man field; Michael Van Niekerk won Men’s Physique.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Moe’s Muscles, Chattanooga Night of Champions and Kazakhstan Pro now appear in the IFBB Pro ledger.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Preparticipation medical exams, an expanded medical team and new water-safety guidance move into the Games framework.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
U.S. road participation reached 52.3 million in 2025; trail running rose to 17.2 million.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
ACSM’s 2026 survey keeps wearable technology on top while recovery, longevity and mental health gain emphasis.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗
Physical activity accounts for a $1.14 trillion market, with mental wellness among the fastest-growing sectors.
Read full ShreddedAF report ↗Seven product classes. Label math, evidence strength, dosing logic and value are scored separately so a loud tub cannot hide weak fundamentals.
Each review distinguishes what is on the label, what research supports, and what remains unknown. No affiliate score inflation.
Ten expanded whey and plant audits now cover formula, regional certification, company accountability, recognition and value as separate questions.
Open 10 product audits ↗Three monohydrate powders compared on dose, product-level certification, transparency and cost—not branding theatre.
Open 3 product audits ↗Three disclosed formulas with caffeine, citrulline, beta-alanine and verification scored as separate questions.
Open 3 product audits ↗Electrolyte and carbohydrate products judged against sodium concentration, session demands and testing evidence.
Open 3 product audits ↗Omega-3 and magnesium products reviewed with public testing, population limits and medical-claim controls.
Open 3 product audits ↗Meal replacements audited as convenient foods—not fat-loss shortcuts—with protein, fibre and testing kept visible.
Open 3 product audits ↗Exact-market formulas compared on nutrient overlap, verification and realistic need—not the longest ingredient list.
Open 3 product audits ↗Evergreen training, food, recovery, longevity and body–mind pages built from primary studies and systematic reviews.
Why full range remains the default while newer trials narrow the gap.
Open evidence review ↗What 17.2 million observations support—and what they cannot prove.
Open evidence review ↗How to read the one-MET signal without turning association into destiny.
Open evidence review ↗How much matters, when timing matters less, and where supplements fit.
Open evidence review ↗Why 7,000 steps is a useful evidence marker—not a magic threshold.
Open evidence review ↗What a 2026 umbrella review found—and what exercise cannot replace.
Open evidence review ↗Why hard sets matter, but true failure is not a universal requirement.
Open evidence review ↗Performance, lean-mass measurement, safety limits and product-audit logic.
Open evidence review ↗Where causal evidence is clear—and where optimisation claims outrun it.
Open evidence review ↗Every factual brief must point to a primary or reputable named source.
Secondary reports are matched to the federation, study, filing or direct statement where available.
No autonomous publishing for allegations, medical claims, leaks, disputed records or transformation claims.
Material updates are timestamped and the source trail remains visible.
The newsletter opens when a real email provider, unsubscribe flow and privacy notice are connected. No pretend signups.
Infrastructure in progress