SHREDDEDAF
A strength athlete loading a barbell backstage before competition
Source-verified sports intelligence

Built on proof.
Not hype.

Strength, endurance, functional fitness and human performance—reported fast, checked against the source and stripped of bro-science.

Enter the newsroom ↘
The feed 10 NOV / 26
01

The newsroom

Competition, participation, technology and industry intelligence—written as original ShreddedAF briefings with a transparent source trail.

01 / Exact event firstWinner, podium and venue imagery is preferred when commercial publication rights are clear.
02 / Permission before creditCredit never substitutes for a licence. Restricted organizer photography stays with the rights-holder.
03 / Archive images labelledWhen exact-event media cannot be republished, the nearest lawful image is identified by event and year.
02

Supplement audits

Seven product classes. Label math, evidence strength, dosing logic and value are scored separately so a loud tub cannot hide weak fundamentals.

ShreddedAF framework / v1.0

We audit the claim,
not the marketing.

Each review distinguishes what is on the label, what research supports, and what remains unknown. No affiliate score inflation.

Category audit

Creatine monohydrate

REFERENCE
Evidence base
A
Label clarity
A−
Claim risk
LOW
Cost signal
€
Illustrative category framework—not a product recommendation or medical advice.
Navigate by goalBuildPerformEndureRecover
01 / Foundation

Protein

Ten expanded whey and plant audits now cover formula, regional certification, company accountability, recognition and value as separate questions.

Open 10 product audits ↗
02 / Performance

Creatine

Three monohydrate powders compared on dose, product-level certification, transparency and cost—not branding theatre.

Open 3 product audits ↗
03

The reference room

Evergreen training, food, recovery, longevity and body–mind pages built from primary studies and systematic reviews.

Nutrition & food / 08 · 4 references

Dietary fibre: food first, numbers second

What 17.2 million observations support—and what they cannot prove.

Open evidence review ↗
Nutrition / 01 · 3 references

Protein for muscle growth: what the evidence supports

How much matters, when timing matters less, and where supplements fit.

Open evidence review ↗
Body & mind / 03 · 3 references

Exercise, depression and anxiety

What a 2026 umbrella review found—and what exercise cannot replace.

Open evidence review ↗
Training / 04 · 3 references

Training to failure: when does it matter?

Why hard sets matter, but true failure is not a universal requirement.

Open evidence review ↗
Recovery & sleep / 06 · 5 references

Sleep loss and performance: what changes first

Where causal evidence is clear—and where optimisation claims outrun it.

Open evidence review ↗
04 / Editorial protocol

Fast is useful.
Wrong is useless.

01

Trace it

Every factual brief must point to a primary or reputable named source.

02

Cross-check it

Secondary reports are matched to the federation, study, filing or direct statement where available.

03

Bound it

No autonomous publishing for allegations, medical claims, leaks, disputed records or transformation claims.

04

Correct it

Material updates are timestamped and the source trail remains visible.

The signal / no spam

One briefing.
Everything that mattered.

Double opt-in required

The newsletter opens when a real email provider, unsubscribe flow and privacy notice are connected. No pretend signups.

Infrastructure in progress
Audit protocol

Four scores. No blended halo.

  1. Evidence: quality and relevance of the research behind the ingredient or claim.
  2. Formula: disclosed amounts, plausible dosing and unnecessary complexity.
  3. Claims: whether the marketing goes beyond what the evidence can carry.
  4. Value: effective servings and price, separated from scientific merit.

Medical, safety-sensitive and prohibited-substance questions never publish autonomously.